Learn how we are here to help and more about our firm. View our results from over 30 years of success. Click here to fill out a case evaluation form.
Contact Us Today
Information Center
Personal Injury
Amputation / Loss of Limb
Blood Cancers
Electrical Injuries
Forklift Accidents
Gasoline Haulers
Grounds for Personal Injury Claims
Liability in a Personal Injury Claim
Lung Cancer
Maritime / Jones Act
Mesothelioma
Physician & Hospital Negligence
Railroad Accidents – FELA
Rubber Workers
Solvents / Benzene
Welding Accidents
Common Questions
Common Questions
General Personal Injury FAQ
Asbestos & Mesothelioma FAQ
Benzene FAQ
Do I Need an Injury Attorney?
What is Toxic Tort?

Medical Malpractice Reform Has Little Effect on Healthcare Costs

It is a common idea: healthcare costs are so high because doctors are forced to order unnecessary tests to protect themselves from liability in medical malpractice lawsuits. Although this notion is widely held in society, a recent study indicates that laws making it harder to sue doctors for medical negligence do not reduce the amount of "defensive medicine" practiced by doctors in states with those medical malpractice reform laws.

The New England Journal of Medicine study found that although "physicians say they order unnecessary tests strictly out of fear of being sued." In actuality, "the story is more complicated." The study looked at the practices of emergency room doctors and associated health care costs of emergency room treatment in Texas, Georgia, and South Carolina (three states that passed laws making it harder for injured patients to recover in medical malpractice lawsuits against emergency room doctors). The study considered three factors associated with defensive medicine: 1) ordering of advanced imaging such as CT or MRI scans, 2) whether the patient was admitted to the hospital after an emergency room visit, and 3) the total billed charges for a patient's emergency room visit. In Texas and South Carolina, the recent medical malpractice reform laws caused no reduction in emergency room charges. In Georgia, average emergency room bills were 3.6% less than before the implementation of the 2005 medical malpractice reform laws.

The author of the study, Daniel Waxman, M.D., Ph.D., indicated that the laws are "legislation looking for a problem that doesn't exist." He stressed that most emergency room doctors are not ordering extra tests in an effort to protect themselves from liability but because emergency room doctors have to make decisions with limited information while avoiding causing harm to the patient and not wanting to say "No" to a patient: "In the ER, you have to make snap judgments on incomplete information. Nobody ever faults you for doing another test or admitting a patient to the hospital, but there are lots of ways you can be faulted for not doing those things."

Whether intentionally or unintentionally, it appears that the legal system and medical negligence lawsuits have become a scapegoat for the costs of modern healthcare. However, in reality, the implementation of medical malpractice reform laws have had little effect on healthcare costs or how emergency room doctors diagnose and treat patients.

If you have sustained injuries from medical negligence, seek legal guidance and protect your rights!

Hartley & O'Brien, PLLC provides aggressive, dedicated representation and quality legal advice to our clients who have been injured as a result of medical negligence. With more than 30 years of experience, our team of personal injury attorneys understands our clients' needs after they experience negligent medical care and fights to provide our clients with full compensation under the law. Call today and speak with one of our team members from our Wheeling or Charleston office!

The Wagner Building, 2001 Main Street, Suite 600, Wheeling, WV 26003
Learn more about personal injury from reading our blog.
Attorney Web Design

Home | Contact Us | Site Map | Privacy Policy

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.